Nigeria is facing a critical crossroads in its industrial development as the trend of foreign-dominated manufacturing partnerships gains momentum. Emmanuel Ezenwere, CEO of Arone Technologies, has cautioned that excessive reliance on international firms for large-scale manufacturing could stifle local innovation and hinder the growth of homegrown industrial capacity. The warning comes amid a N12.95 billion collaboration between Arone Technologies and the Institute of Management and Technology (IMT), Enugu, covering production of luminal units, drones, and AI servers.
Why Foreign-Dominated Manufacturing Matters
Foreign-dominated manufacturing partnerships shape not only the technology landscape but also the broader economic environment. By prioritizing foreign investors over local companies, Nigeria risks creating an industrial ecosystem where domestic firms struggle to compete. Ezenwere highlighted that government policies, while professing support for local manufacturers, often favour large foreign-led projects, leaving indigenous companies at a disadvantage. This trend could result in long-term dependence on external technology providers, limiting Nigeria’s ability to innovate independently.
Impact on Local Manufacturers and Households
For local manufacturers, foreign-dominated manufacturing reduces opportunities for skill development, technology transfer, and the creation of sustainable supply chains. Companies attempting to scale up are often sidelined, which can demoralize innovators and discourage entrepreneurship. Households, meanwhile, may experience indirect effects through higher product costs and limited availability of domestically manufactured goods, especially in sectors such as renewable energy and electronics where reliance on imported technology remains high.
Ezenwere pointed to past partnerships as illustrative examples. In 2023, the Rural Electrification Agency (REA) and NASENI signed a $150 million battery manufacturing deal with Chinese investors. Similarly, Huawei and LONGi have recently established solar energy projects in Nigeria. While these collaborations address immediate capacity needs, they risk marginalizing local manufacturers who lack the same financial and technological resources.
Long-Term Strategic Concerns
The broader concern with foreign-dominated manufacturing lies in the absence of long-term strategic thinking. Ezenwere warned that without intentional policies to nurture domestic companies, foreign firms could consolidate dominance, making it increasingly difficult for local players to emerge. He likened the situation to a “nuclear reaction,” explaining that once foreign companies reach critical mass, counteracting their influence becomes exponentially harder.
This perspective underscores the need for an industrial policy that balances foreign investment with indigenous growth. Policymakers are urged to create conditions where local manufacturers can scale, innovate, and compete on equal footing. Doing so would strengthen Nigeria’s industrial base and reduce economic vulnerability associated with overreliance on external suppliers.
Policy Implications and the Renewable Energy Sector
The debate over foreign-dominated manufacturing has particular relevance in renewable energy. Nigeria’s push for domestic solar panel production, including a proposed ban on imports, reflects a desire to stimulate local capacity. Critics, however, argue that without comprehensive governance and support mechanisms, local manufacturers may still struggle to compete with entrenched foreign companies. The policy approach must therefore prioritize capacity-building, incentives, and infrastructure support to ensure that domestic firms thrive.
Economic and Business Considerations
Businesses engaged in industrial production are directly impacted by the balance between foreign and local participation. Foreign-dominated manufacturing may offer short-term efficiency and technological expertise but can reduce the long-term competitiveness of Nigerian firms. Entrepreneurs may face higher barriers to entry, and local innovation ecosystems may weaken, resulting in slower domestic economic growth. Households could see fewer locally produced goods, higher prices, and less access to homegrown technological solutions.
To counter the risks of foreign-dominated manufacturing, experts advocate for a comprehensive industrial strategy that fosters indigenous innovation. This includes targeted funding for local firms, protection of intellectual property, technology transfer agreements, and incentives for domestic production. Ezenwere emphasized that supporting local manufacturers is not merely a policy preference but a national imperative to secure long-term industrial resilience and competitiveness.
Foreign-dominated manufacturing partnerships present both opportunities and risks for Nigeria. While they can bring technology, investment, and immediate production capacity, unchecked reliance on foreign firms may undermine local industrial development. Policymakers must balance these interests to create an ecosystem where indigenous companies can thrive, benefiting the economy, businesses, and households alike. A strong, competitive domestic manufacturing sector is crucial for Nigeria to maintain industrial sovereignty and sustainable growth in the years ahead.
De Beers posts US$511m loss as weak global and Chinese demand hit Africa’s diamond sector