We Are Not Part Of Any Planned Demonstration Against Chief Justice’s Removal – GUM
The Ghana Union Movement (G.U.M) has publicly distanced itself from a planned demonstration against the suspension of the Chief Justice and termination of judicial appointments, describing media reports linking the party to the protest as “untrue.”
In an official disclaimer dated April 26, 2025, the party’s General Secretary, Anthony A. Gold Ahinful, clarified that G.U.M was neither consulted nor part of any coalition organizing the protest scheduled for May 5, 2025.
The statement emphasized three critical points:
1. No Prior Engagement:
“G.U.M had never been informed, engaged or the party’s consent sought in any official meeting to that effect.”
2. Non-Participation Directive:
The party ordered its members to “abstain from such demonstration,” reaffirming its commitment to democratic principles.
3. Rule of Law Stance:
G.U.M insists the Chief Justice’s case should be resolved legally, stating: “Anyone who believes contrary should exclude G.U.M from that act.”
The disclaimer categorically refuted reports naming G.U.M among protesting parties, urging the public to treat such claims as “something of no legitimate value.”
Background to the Planned Protest
The protest, reportedly organized by a coalition of political parties, challenges the controversial suspension of the Chief Justice and abrupt termination of judicial appointments. The parties were reported to include the New Patriotic Party (NPP), Liberal Party of Ghana (LPG), National Democratic Party (NDP), and People’s National Party (PNP), among others.
G.U.M’s dissociation underscores divisions in Ghana’s political landscape regarding judicial independence and due process.
It is important to note that all those against the Chief Justice’s removal process have yet to state a constitutional provision which has been breached to warrant their opposition.
Furthermore, it is not automatic that once the process has started the Chief Justice must be removed. Justice Gertrude Torkornoo will resume her position if her defense before the 5-member committee satisfactorily absolves her of all charges brought against her in the petitions. However, failure to mount a meritorious defense will result in her permanent removal from office.
