Lawyers in Wontumi trial demand full disclosure accuse prosecution of withholding documents
Lawyers representing a prominent Ghanaian political figure currently standing trial for alleged illegal mining have demanded full disclosure of all evidence. They accused the prosecution of withholding key documents, claiming this violates fair trial principles and undermines the integrity of the judicial process.
The trial centres on accusations that the defendant’s company engaged in mining activities without valid licences. The charges stem from a larger crackdown on illegal mining operations across the country. The prosecution had previously arrested several individuals during an anti-galamsey operation and alleged the mining took place on lands without proper approval.
During pre-trial proceedings, defense lawyers requested access to documents that outline licensing status mining concession history environmental clearance records and communications between regulatory agencies and the accused parties. They argued that without these documents they cannot properly prepare their defence or verify the legitimacy of the charges.
In a formal motion filed with the court, the defence team stated that the prosecution’s refusal or delay in handing over documents was unacceptable. They emphasized that Ghana’s legal system is built on transparency and the right to a fair hearing. The lawyers warned that failure to comply may result in motions to dismiss or delays in trial.
Legal commentators have voiced concern over the situation, noting that withholding evidence undermines public trust in prosecution processes. They said full disclosure is vital especially in high-profile cases involving natural resources, public officials, and allegations of corruption or illicit operations.
If the prosecution fails to provide the requested evidence the court may consider rulings that could weaken the case. Observers say such a development could set a precedent affecting future galamsey-related trials and influence how the legal system handles resource-related offences.
Meanwhile civil society organisations tracking environmental crime and resource governance have called on authorities to maintain public confidence by ensuring transparency and adherence to due process. They argue that only through a credible judicial process can Ghana adequately fight illegal mining.
As the trial proceeds the spotlight is on the court to enforce disclosure rules and on the prosecution to produce documented evidence. The outcome will not only determine the fate of the defendant but may influence broader efforts to regulate the mining industry and uphold the rule of law.
