Anti Galamsey Army Commander Urges Offensive Actions in Ghana’s Fight Against Illegal Mining
The Army Commander leading Ghana’s anti galamsey taskforce has called for a shift toward more aggressive offensive operations in the country’s fight against illegal mining. Speaking at a public event, he argued that current enforcement methods alone are insufficient to curb the rise of unlicensed mining, environmental degradation and the destruction of communities.
According to the commander, illegal mining networks continue to operate with impunity in remote and forested areas because weak enforcement and limited reach hamper deterrence. He proposed that state forces adopt a proactive posture built around intelligence gathering sustained patrols targeted raids and permanent presence in hotspot zones.
He made clear that any offensive strategy must be lawful rigorous and based on accurate intelligence. The goal is to dismantle the structure of illicit mining syndicates rather than simply chase individual operators. He said that coordinated operations with police environmental agencies and local leaders are essential to root out the leadership behind illegal mining rings.
The commander also highlighted that communities suffering from illegal mining’s impacts such as water pollution soil erosion and loss of agricultural land—require protection. He emphasised that state forces should work with traditional authorities to secure strategic locations and prevent further environmental harm.
In addition to security operations he called for stronger policy reform. He recommended stricter licensing controls, enhanced monitoring of licensed operations, and collaboration with local communities to establish legal mining cooperatives. This dual strategy of enforcement plus empowerment could provide sustainable alternatives to those drawn into illegal mining.
Environmental organisations welcomed his remarks but urged that any offensive action respect human rights and due process. Some activists called for transparency in operations, independent monitoring of raids and accountability for force misuse. They warned that without proper safeguards, aggressive tactics may create mistrust or provoke backlash from local communities.
Economists and governance watchers say that an offensive anti galamsey strategy could prove costly but potentially worthwhile. They argue that the long term economic and environmental benefits justify increased resource allocation. Moreover, reducing illegal mining could improve government revenue by formalising sector operations and restoring degraded land for legal productivity.
Local residents in mining affected regions voiced cautious support for the commander’s plan. Some expressed frustration at ongoing destruction and expressed hope that stronger action can provide lasting relief. Others called for community engagement so that enforcement does not feel like imposed military control but a shared mission.
The Army Commander concluded by stressing the urgency of decisive action. He said that if the state fails to act more forcefully illegal mining will continue to grow, undermining Ghana’s environmental future. He asked the government to support his call with resources training and political will.
As Ghana continues its struggle with galamsey, the commander’s proposal for offensive actions presents a bold vision. Whether this strategy will be adopted and how it will be executed remain to be seen but the conversation marks a significant moment in the national debate on mining reform.
