Ablakwa tells Parliament Ghana did not request money to accept West African deportees
Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa has firmly rejected claims that Ghana demanded money to accept West African nationals who had been deported, clarifying his position in a tense parliamentary session. He maintained that Ghana’s response to deportations has always been guided by regional cooperation and moral duty not financial transaction.
Ablakwa explained that repatriation usually happens through diplomatic efforts and regional frameworks not through cash payments. He stated clearly that Ghana neither solicited funds nor received direct financial compensation from other states when accommodating deported citizens. Rather, he argued, what often arises are logistical and coordination costs managed through diplomatic channels or supported by international organisations.
He urged the government to release full details of all repatriation agreements to dispel misconceptions. According to Ablakwa, transparency around funding arrangements, budgets, and operational costs would strengthen public trust and ensure accountability. He also proposed that Parliament establish a dedicated committee to monitor repatriation initiatives and report regularly to citizens.
Beyond finance, Ablakwa emphasised the need for Ghana to treat returning citizens with dignity. He said the state should offer reintegration assistance including skills training, job placement, and psychosocial support. He added that many of those returning face harsh economic conditions and support systems must be scaled up to prevent their social exclusion.
His comments have resonated with civil society organisations, which continue to call for a robust framework for deportee reintegration one that combines financial, social, and legal support. They argue that Ghana’s leadership role in Africa means it must uphold a standards based approach to repatriation rather than be dragged into transactional arrangements.
Immigration policy experts welcomed the demand for openness. They see a review of repatriation strategy as an opportunity to build a more resilient system one that protects returnees’ rights, encourages regional collaboration, and upholds human dignity. For many, Ablakwa’s appeal marks a pivot toward a more principled, accountable approach.
In closing, he said the debate must be grounded in facts, not political sensationalism. “Let facts guide us, not rumours,” he asserted. He warned against narratives that reduce migrating citizens to monetary bargaining chips insisting that Ghana’s response must reflect respect for sovereignty and compassion for its people.
