Adu-Boahene Trial to Proceed After Supreme Court Rejects Recusal Motion

The Supreme Court has dismissed a motion by lawyers representing former National Signals Bureau (NSB) Director-General, Kwabena Adu-Boahene, seeking to disqualify the judge presiding over his ongoing criminal trial for allegedly causing a $49 million financial loss to the state.

The apex court’s decision, delivered by a five-member panel, was unanimous. The judges ruled that the application lacked merit and failed to meet the legal threshold required to justify the recusal of the High Court judge, Justice John Eugene Nyante Nyadu.

This ruling effectively clears the way for the substantive case to continue before Justice Nyadu, who has been overseeing proceedings since the charges were first brought against Mr. Adu-Boahene.

Reacting to the judgment, the lead counsel for Mr. Adu-Boahene, Hon. Samuel Atta Akyea, expressed disappointment but maintained that the defense team remains resolute in seeking justice through due process.

“I am disappointed but not discouraged,” Atta Akyea told journalists outside the courthouse. “The persuasion a judge should have is the law. I will continue to argue the case on its legal merits. This outcome doesn’t move me at all.”

The lawyer, who is also a former Minister for Works and Housing and Member of Parliament for Abuakwa South, indicated that while the defense respects the Supreme Court’s authority, it will continue to explore all legitimate legal options to ensure fairness for their client.

Background to the Court Case

Kwabena Adu-Boahene, who served as Director-General of the National Signals Bureau — Ghana’s intelligence and communications monitoring agency — was charged with causing financial loss to the state following investigations into a contract allegedly valued at $49 million.

The details of the case involve allegations that certain procurement and operational decisions taken during his tenure resulted in significant losses to the government. Prosecutors contend that the accused failed to ensure proper compliance with financial administration laws, leading to wastage and inefficiency.

Mr. Adu-Boahene has denied all charges, maintaining that his actions were within his professional mandate and in the national interest.

The High Court began hearing the case earlier this year, but the defense filed an application before the Supreme Court seeking to have Justice Nyante Nyadu recused, citing concerns of bias.

However, the Supreme Court ruled that the motion was “without merit,” adding that no sufficient evidence had been presented to justify claims of bias or conflict of interest.

Legal analysts say the ruling underscores the judiciary’s commitment to maintaining judicial independence and preventing abuse of recusal applications as a delay tactic.

According to private legal practitioner, Kwame Gyan, the decision reflects the principle that “a judge cannot be removed merely because one party is unhappy with prior rulings.”

“The law is clear — unless there is demonstrable bias or a reasonable apprehension of prejudice, a trial judge cannot be asked to step aside. The Supreme Court’s reasoning reaffirms that principle,” he told the Daily Graphic in a phone interview.

Such rulings, experts note, are critical in safeguarding the integrity of Ghana’s courts, particularly in high-profile cases involving public officials and financial accountability.

The Adu-Boahene case is one of several ongoing prosecutions involving allegations of financial malfeasance in state institutions. The outcome will be closely watched as a test of Ghana’s commitment to combating corruption through judicial means rather than political rhetoric.

Ghana ranked 70th out of 180 countries in Transparency International’s 2024 Corruption Perceptions Index, maintaining a score of 43 out of 100 — unchanged from the previous year. Analysts say cases like this are crucial in demonstrating the state’s resolve to improve accountability in public office.

Political observers also note that the involvement of a former intelligence chief adds complexity to the case, given the sensitivity of national security operations and the confidentiality surrounding such agencies.

Following the Supreme Court’s ruling, proceedings at the High Court are expected to resume next month. Both prosecution and defense teams have indicated their readiness to proceed.

The Attorney General’s office, which is leading the state’s case, is expected to call additional witnesses to strengthen its claims. Meanwhile, the defense is preparing to challenge key pieces of evidence, arguing that the alleged loss was based on misinterpretation of operational expenses and classified procurement procedures.

Court officials have not yet announced the next hearing date, but sources indicate that the case is likely to continue before the end of the current legal term.

The decision by the Supreme Court serves as a precedent for future attempts to disqualify judges without substantial cause. Judicial independence has been a recurring theme in Ghana’s democratic journey, with the bench frequently emphasizing the need for impartiality and public confidence in the justice system.

Civil society groups, including the Ghana Integrity Initiative (GII), have welcomed the court’s firmness, describing it as a positive step in promoting rule of law. However, they also urged both sides to ensure that the trial proceeds without unnecessary delays or political interference.

“Justice must not only be done but must be seen to be done,” a GII statement noted, adding that swift and fair adjudication of corruption-related cases remains vital to public trust.

With the Supreme Court’s decision now final, the stage is set for a full trial in what could become one of the most closely watched corruption cases in recent years. For Mr. Adu-Boahene, the challenge lies in clearing his name, while for the prosecution, the burden is to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the state indeed suffered financial loss.

As the High Court reconvenes, attention will focus on whether the case can set a benchmark for transparency and accountability in the management of public funds — and whether Ghana’s justice system can deliver justice free from fear or favour.

Read also: Ex-Buffer Stock CEO, Wife in ₵78m Theft Scandal as EOCO Uncovers Major Public Funds Diversion