Speaker Bagbin Calls for Official Annual Leave for Members of Parliament

The Speaker of Parliament, Rt. Hon. Alban Sumana Kingsford Bagbin, has proposed the introduction of a formalised annual leave policy for Members of Parliament, highlighting the significant personal and familial toll of the current workload. Speaking on Tuesday, October 21, 2025, during the opening session of the Third Meeting of the First Session of the Ninth Parliament in Accra, Bagbin underscored that parliamentary recesses do not equate to genuine breaks for legislators, who continue to undertake committee meetings, constituency oversight visits and state agency interactions.

The Speaker lamented that the demands placed on MPs leave them with scant time for rest or family life, stating: “Those of us who have sacrificed all these years, we know how our families have been destroyed because you never have time for your family or people dear to your heart.” He argued that while the Labour Act provides for mandated leave for most workers, Ghana’s parliamentarians operate without such formal protections. He urged colleagues to initiate discussions within Parliament and with external stakeholders to define a period of leave that can afford MPs a “breathing space” for rest and reconnection with family.

In his address, Bagbin also suggested that the House Standing Orders be amended to accommodate annual leave for MPs, framing the proposal as both a welfare measure and one that could enhance the effectiveness of governance by preventing burnout and improving oversight capability.

The reaction to the proposal has been mixed. Some analysts and civil society actors welcomed the initiative as an acknowledgement of the intense demands placed on MPs and a step toward better legislative welfare. Others raised questions about how leave would be operationalised given the overlapping nature of constituency work, oversight duties and parliamentary sittings. Critics pointed out that absence of MPs from Parliament may affect quorum, committee performance and representation of constituents.

Historically, Ghana’s MPs have not had dedicated annual leave policies; the “recess” is often treated as a period for committee or constituency activity rather than rest. This situation has been a recurrent topic among parliamentarians, many of whom argue that constant travel between Accra and their constituencies, attendance at oversight duties, and plenary engagements prevent meaningful downtime.

According to Bagbin, MPs “don’t go on holidays or vacation. They recede to continue the work of a Member of Parliament.” The practical implications of the proposed leave would involve scheduling gaps in parliamentary sessions, ensuring committees are resourced for continuity and possibly introducing staggered leave periods or substitution mechanisms to maintain legislative functions.

Beyond logistics, the call for annual leave echoes global trends in legislatures recognising the welfare of elected representatives. Several parliamentary systems abroad define specific leave periods or holiday recess durations, recognising that legislative work is both demanding and ongoing and that absence of rest may degrade decision-making quality, raise mental health concerns and limit constituent accessibility.

In Ghana’s context the proposal intersects with wider questions of parliamentary reform, workload management, and representation. With MPs often juggling national duties, constituency expectations and party responsibilities, the burden can be heavy. By advocating for formal leave, Bagbin has foregrounded the human dimension of governance—one that involves families, health and personal sacrifice.

However execution will be key. Issues to be resolved include how leave interplays with crucial oversight functions, whether leave will be paid or unpaid, how coordination will happen across committees and how constituents will be served during MP absence. Additional safeguards may be required to prevent extended absence from constituency engagement or legislative duty under the guise of leave.

For constituents the proposal is a reminder that MPs are human agents subject to fatigue and demand. Promoting representative welfare may, in turn, support better legislative output, oversight of executive functions and responsiveness to citizen needs. But practical implementation will need transparency, clear guidelines and communication on how representation is maintained.

At a time when governance, oversight and legislative activism are under intense public scrutiny, the Speaker’s initiative may mark the beginning of broader structural reforms in parliamentary operations. Whether annual leave becomes a reality will depend on consensus among parliamentary leadership, committees, party whips and administrative staff charged with scheduling and resource management.

For now the discussion has begun. Parliament, external stakeholders and legislative staff must engage to define how annual leave can be introduced without compromising legislative duties, ensuring MPs can rest and reconnect while the institution continues its critical functions.

Parliament Approves 4 Deputy Ministers After Vetting