What Bryan said about alleged payment to NPP executives for Bawumia to win primaries
A recent statement by media personality Bryan Acheampong has stirred intense discussion in political circles after he addressed allegations that New Patriotic Party executives were paid to support Vice President Mahamudu Bawumia’s bid to win the party’s presidential primaries. His remarks offer insight into ongoing debates about internal party democracy, loyalty and ethical conduct.
Bryan spoke passionately about the importance of transparent political processes, urging party members and supporters to focus on substantive issues rather than unverified claims. He emphasised that Ghana’s major political parties must uphold integrity in all aspects of internal contests, particularly as they revolve around leadership transitions and candidate endorsements.
According to Bryan, allegations of financial inducements to secure internal support risk undermining confidence in the democratic process within the party. He urged anyone with credible evidence of wrongdoing to present it to appropriate investigative bodies rather than engage in speculation or social media exchanges that could inflame tensions.
He also noted that political parties are complex organisations with diverse views and interests. Contest outcomes, he said, should reflect genuine support from members and grassroots structures rather than external influence or coercion.
The context of his comments comes at a time when party politics in Ghana continues to attract scrutiny over campaign financing and patronage. Internal debates within political formations often revolve around leadership credibility, loyalty to party ideals, and the role of influential figures in shaping candidate success.
Bryan’s perspective resonated with many who emphasise that political integrity is central to national democratic culture. He reiterated that political contests should be free, fair and driven by ideas that serve the public interest, rather than personal ambition or transactional arrangements.
While he did not confirm any specific allegation, his statement has prompted calls for clearer codes of conduct in party elections and nominations. Observers say that stronger regulations on internal party processes can help mitigate the risk of corruption, undue influence, or perceived impropriety.
Critics of allegations regarding payments said that speculation without substantiation can damage reputations and distract from policy discussions that matter to voters. They argue that focus should be on how candidates articulate vision for national development, economic stability, and public welfare.
Bryan concluded his remarks by emphasising unity and the need to strengthen internal party mechanisms that promote accountability, transparency and mutual respect among political actors. He urged party members to hold leaders to high ethical standards and to reject narratives that serve to divide or mislead.
The conversation on internal political conduct continues to attract attention as parties prepare for upcoming national elections. Public interest in the transparency and integrity of political contests reflects broader expectations for democratic practice and governance reform in Ghana.
