A Plus Slams NACOC Commissioner Over Abu Trica Interrogation Conduct
The public exchange between Ghanaian artiste-political activist Kwame Asare Obeng, widely known as A Plus, and the Commissioner of the Narcotics Control Commission has put a spotlight on how law enforcement agencies handle high profile interrogations. The confrontation emerged after the December 2025 custody hearing of Frederick Kumi, popularly called Abu Trica, who is facing criminal charges in the United States for his alleged role in a multi-million-dollar online romance scam targeting elderly victims.
A Plus questioned the professionalism and approach used by the NACOC commissioner during Abu Trica’s interrogation, raising concerns about procedural adherence and fairness. He asked how a well-trained lawyer in law enforcement could overlook critical aspects of the interrogation process, especially given the high-profile nature of the case and its wider implications for Ghana’s fight against organised crime.
In remarks shared on social media and reported widely, A Plus emphasised that interrogation practices should be beyond reproach, particularly when suspects are facing serious allegations both domestically and abroad. He said that the manner of questioning could affect public confidence in law enforcement and urged the commission to consider best practices that respect human rights and legal standards.
The NACOC leadership has not yet issued a formal response to the critique. However, law enforcement officials in Ghana say that all interrogation procedures are bound by strict guidelines designed to protect the integrity of investigations and preserve admissible evidence in court. These protocols also aim to protect the rights of every suspect, regardless of their profile. This exchange has sparked debate among legal practitioners, civil society groups, and citizens about transparency, accountability, and the rights of suspects under Ghanaian law.
Abu Trica’s arrest by Ghanaian authorities came as part of broader cooperation with international partners, including the United States, following allegations that he led or facilitated a large-scale internet romance scam that targeted vulnerable elderly victims. Security sources say the suspect allegedly used artificial intelligence technology and fake online profiles to build trust with victims before soliciting significant sums of money.
The legal controversy now unfolding in Ghana adds a complex domestic angle to an already highly scrutinised criminal matter. Advocates for criminal justice reform say that the case underscores how modern cybercrime cases can test traditional investigative systems that were not originally designed for confronting highly technical and transnational criminal networks.
Beyond the courtroom, the broader conversation has tapped into public concerns about cybercrime, online scams, and how authorities balance rigorous investigation with respect for justice and individual rights. The arrest and interrogation of Abu Trica have become a focal point, not just because of the financial scale of the allegations but because of what the case represents in Ghana’s evolving security and legal landscape.
As the legal process continues both domestically and internationally, all eyes are on how Ghana’s law enforcement agencies manage public expectations, uphold procedural integrity, and contribute to a broader strategy to tackle cybercrime, protect victims and uphold the rule of law.
