Maverick City Music CEO Responds to Chandler Moore’s Lawsuit Allegations

Maverick City Music’s co-founder and CEO, Jonathan Jay, has pushed back strongly against allegations made by former member Chandler Moore, who recently filed a lawsuit accusing the worship collective’s leadership of breaching agreements and undermining his role in the group. The dispute, now unfolding in U.S. courts under Moore v Gyamfi, has sent shockwaves through the gospel music world, highlighting the tensions between faith-based artistry and the realities of business in the contemporary Christian music industry.

In a statement released following Moore’s legal filing, Jonathan Jay described the claims as “categorically false” and “calculated attempts to strong-arm a way out of agreements Chandler made freely and later breached.” He maintained that Maverick City Music had acted “forthrightly, generously, and above reproach,” stressing that the organization has always operated with integrity and grace. “We acted in good faith, gave more than what was required, and consistently extended grace,” Jay said, reaffirming the group’s commitment to its founding mission of creating music that uplifts and unites believers through worship.

Chandler Moore’s lawsuit paints a different picture. It accuses Maverick City’s leadership of breaching contractual obligations, mishandling internal business arrangements, and taking actions that allegedly hurt his professional and financial standing. Legal experts say the case will likely focus on issues of contract interpretation, revenue-sharing, and intellectual property rights—common points of friction when artistic collectives evolve into major commercial brands.

Maverick City Music, founded in 2018 by Jonathan Jay and Tony Brown, rose from an independent worship project to one of the most influential gospel collectives in the world. Known for its raw, communal sound and inclusive ethos, the group broke denominational and racial barriers, reshaping modern worship music. Chandler Moore, one of its most recognizable voices, was instrumental in that rise—his collaborations on songs like “Jireh” and “Promises” turned into global anthems. His departure and subsequent lawsuit mark a significant turning point for both the group and the broader gospel music landscape.

Jay’s public response signals that the dispute is not just a private disagreement but a reputational battle that could shape perceptions of Maverick City’s brand. The lawsuit has already triggered heated debates across social media, with fans, church leaders, and industry observers taking sides. Many have expressed disappointment, describing the situation as a test of integrity for one of gospel music’s most beloved movements. Others have urged caution, reminding followers that both parties deserve due process before conclusions are drawn.

While neither side has disclosed the financial specifics of the lawsuit, Moore’s complaint reportedly seeks damages and other remedies related to his contracts and creative contributions. Industry insiders suggest the dispute could influence how future gospel collectives structure their agreements, especially around royalties, content ownership, and performance rights. As gospel music increasingly merges ministry with mainstream entertainment, such cases expose the complexities of managing faith-driven artistry in commercial spaces.

Jay’s statement emphasized that Maverick City remains focused on its mission despite the legal distractions. “Maverick City will continue to build and create music that lifts the name of Jesus,” he declared. His words seem intended not only for fans but also for stakeholders—labels, distributors, and churches that rely on the group’s influence to shape worship trends. The message is clear: the movement will endure, even as it navigates internal storms.

For Chandler Moore, the lawsuit represents more than a contractual disagreement—it’s a public assertion of autonomy in an industry where artists often struggle for creative and financial recognition. Moore has yet to issue a detailed follow-up statement, but sources close to his camp suggest he believes his contributions were not fairly valued after years of dedication to the collective’s success.

Observers within the gospel music scene see parallels between this dispute and previous cases involving artist collectives that grew faster than their governance structures. As Maverick City transitioned from a tight-knit worship movement to a global brand—winning Grammys, topping Billboard charts, and performing with mainstream artists—its organizational model likely became more complex, requiring clearer accountability and communication.

The case also raises broader questions about the intersection of faith, commerce, and ethics in gospel music. How should Christian artists handle disputes over money, ownership, and recognition without compromising their message of unity and grace? And what does it mean for a ministry-oriented brand to face legal battles that mirror those of secular entertainment companies? These are the debates now surfacing in Christian media circles as the situation unfolds.

https://www.instagram.com/p/DPjkrRrjhcN/?igsh=MWx4eG9xcjhqMTg0eg==

For Ghanaian and African gospel audiences, who have embraced Maverick City’s sound and style, the controversy feels personal. Many choirs, youth ministries, and worship collectives across Africa have drawn inspiration from the group’s collaborative model. The outcome of this case could indirectly influence how emerging gospel brands on the continent approach contracts, partnerships, and artist management—balancing ministry goals with professional structures.

As things stand, the lawsuit remains active, and both sides have indicated a willingness to let the legal process run its course. The case is expected to move through discovery and depositions in the coming months, possibly leading to either a trial or an out-of-court settlement. Whatever the outcome, the implications for Maverick City—and for the modern gospel music industry—are significant.

For now, Jonathan Jay appears determined to defend the integrity of the organization he helped build, while Chandler Moore stands firm on his right to seek redress. Their conflict serves as a reminder that even in spaces dedicated to worship and faith, the human dimensions of ambition, disagreement, and accountability still play out in full.

Forbes Reveals the Stunning List of the World’s Richest Musicians in 2025