MP Annoh Dompreh draws backlash after calling President a dead goat
The Member of Parliament for Nsawam–Adoagyiri, Hon. Frank Annoh Dompreh, has sparked widespread criticism after referring to the sitting President as a “dead goat.” The remark came amid a campaign event for the major party’s flagbearer hopeful, and has triggered a sharp backlash online from citizens and political commentators.
During his address, the MP argued that if a leader who had lost power could return to lead the country again, then the party’s flagbearer hopeful could also overcome political setbacks. He used the disparaging “dead goat” metaphor to illustrate his point about political comeback.
The comment was met with strong condemnation from social media users who attacked both the language and tone used. Many questioned how a sitting lawmaker could address a president in such derogatory terms, arguing that it undermines respect for public office and degrades political discourse. Among the criticisms, one user described the remark as “careless,” warning that such communication errors could damage the public image of the MP’s party.
Others argued that the statement reflects a worrying trend in political communication, where sensationalist remarks overshadow mature debate and policy discussion. Critiques pointed to the potential consequences for national unity and civic respect if public figures continue to normalise inflammatory language.
Some defenders of the MP say he was attempting to draw an analogy about political redemption and resilience. They argue that the “dead goat” reference was a hyperbole intended to emphasise that past political failures do not automatically disqualify a candidate’s future prospects. However, many remain unconvinced, highlighting that the metaphor was unnecessarily disrespectful and poorly timed. As reactions continue to pour in, observers note that the controversy may influence public sentiment ahead of forthcoming party primaries and national elections. Whether the MP will apologise or clarify his remarks remains to be seen — but for now, his words have stirred a national conversation about respect, decorum and political rhetoric.
